Review: The City

The City
The City by Dean Koontz
My rating: 2 of 5 stars

“The City is simultaneously an interesting and a boring book” – Rabindranauth
“[W]hat happened to the Dean Koontz” – Patrice Hoffman
“[T]he worst Dean Koontz book I have ever read” – Elspeth

These are some of the quotes from folks at Goodreads. I get it. I get what Dean Koontz was trying to do in THE CITY. And for the most part I can handle strange, queer, and imaginative. Not so much the rambling. That’s what makes this so different.

I bet the reviews would be better if Koontz wrote this under a pseudonym. Look at THE FIRST FIFTEEN LIVES OF HARRY AUGUST. That book got great reviews; part of what added to it is the mysteriousness of having “an acclaimed author” behind the helm. I enjoyed that part; it added a spice to the book.

The rambling wouldn’t taste as sour if Koontz didn’t repeatedly point out he was rambling. He writes, “if the story is fourteen blocks long, I sometimes start on block four and have to backtrack to make sense.” Then he writes, “I tend to ramble when I talk, like now into this recorder.” And again in a later chapter, “I hop around, back and forth, so maybe you’ll see the uncanny way that things connected.” Ugh.

But let’s get back to what Koontz is doing here. He opens the book with a quote from Thomas Mann saying, “Hold every moment sacred. Give each clarity and meaning, each the weight of thine awareness, each its true and due fulfillment.” Koontz later in the book writes, “In our lives, we come to moments of great significance that we fail to recognize, the meaning of which does not occur to us for many years.” There’s something deep here; he just bounces around getting to it.

There is plenty of mysterious things you’d expect from Koontz: a lady randomly showing up, claiming to be the embodiment of the city; a friend who determines what kind of day it’ll be by flipping breaded toast (is it a butter-up side day?); an orb; future-seeing dreams; and an eclectic set of neighbors. The story is told from the voice of a fifty-six-year-old protagonist looking back on his nine-year-old self. His mom is struggling after dad leaves and pieces of danger manifest themselves. The boy longs to play the piano and yes, as the beginning states, he dies and rises again.

This book explores the themes of life, as well as that of art and music (there is even a special moment dedicated to that of The Goldfinch painting; sound familiar?). As the protagonist proclaims, “Mine is a story of love reciprocated. It is the story of loss and hope, and of the strangeness that lies just beneath the surface tension of daily life, a strangeness infinite fathoms in depth.” And, in the end, ““No matter what, everything will be okay in the long run.”

If you are willing to part with your Koontz expectations and sit around as the tale is spun, then you may find some particular enjoyment in this story. What you’ll find is this (as Kootnz writes): “That’s life. Always something, more good than bad, but always interesting if you’re paying attention.” And that is this book, too.

Thanks to Bantam and Random House for providing an electronic copy of this book for me to review.

You can find other reviews and a preview of this book at Amazon: The City: A Novel

Enjoy!

Advertisements

6 thoughts on “Review: The City

  1. Cole

    I’ve become quite wary of Koontz books. I’m a HUGE fan of his older work, but something strange has happened to him recently. Perhaps he’s tired? Or maybe we’ve pigeon-holed him with our expectations and we’re not seeing what he’s really up to. I don’t know. I read “Breathless” a few months ago and LOVED the story… then made the mistake of reading the Goodreads reviews and couldn’t understand why everyone else hated the book. Maybe he retired long ago and what we’re getting now is the result of poorly selected ghostwriters?

    Reply
    1. ryandejonghe Post author

      You never know. There are some 5-star reviews of this book on Goodreads; it is funny how different books affect different people. There is some merit to the book, but definitely not what many Koontz fans are seeking.

      BTW, I’m working through your book. Hope to have a review next week. 🙂

      Reply
      1. Cole

        Well, reading/writing is all subjective anyway – I think that’s the beauty of it.

        Thanks for the update – not in a hurry, though. Enjoy it 🙂

  2. Gillian Cartier Hollett

    You said,
    “If you are willing to part with your Koontz expectations and sit around as the tale is spun, then you may find some particular enjoyment in this story. What you’ll find is this (as Kootnz writes): “That’s life. Always something, more good than bad, but always interesting if you’re paying attention.” And that is this book, too.”

    How come only a 2 star then? You weren’t willing? Or something else?

    Personally I wouldn’t read any book by Dean Koontz, but this paragraph confused me a bit in relation to your rating.

    Reply
    1. ryandejonghe Post author

      Haha, yeah, I’m a confusing star giver. I liked the premise of what he was shooting at, but the rambling turned me off. Some folks are okay with it, such as Catcher in the Rye (many folks love it).

      Reply
    2. ryandejonghe Post author

      Oh, and I use Goodreads to post these reviews. There, two stars means “it was ok” and three is “I liked it”. When I post to Amazon, I’ll probably give it three, which is their “ok”, but oddly, is considered a negative review when you sort reviews with them. It all serves just to confuse me more. 🙂

      Reply

I love comments, so tell me what you think:

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s